rosemary
Cultural layer
Salvia rosmarinus Spenn. (Plants of the World Online, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, accessed 2026-10-04)
The Oxford Companion to Food (Alan Davidson, 1999)
William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act IV, scene 5 (Project Gutenberg eBook 1524)
Route
PendingThe routes are written. They are not yet mapped.
This entry's cultural layer already names where it came from and how it moved. What it does not yet carry is that movement as structure: ordered waypoints with real coordinates, and a mechanism on each leg. Until it does, the layer stays an empty slot rather than a drawn line, because a map built from prose would be a guess with a projection under it.
1 of 409 entries carries a mapped route · nutmeg is the prototype
- Waypoints
Ordered places, each with its kind
- Coordinates
Real positions, with the gazetteer they came from
- Segments
From, to, and the mechanism that moved it
- Confidence
Documented, attributed or contested
- Summary
What the route argues, in a sentence
Connections
14 bonds · 14 sourcedSet in bold capitals in The Flavor Bible: very highly recommended by a large number of the chefs it surveyed.
Read from the entry for rosemary in the 2008 edition.
Potatoes browned in the fat of a rosemary roast.
Read in Artusi, recipe 369, àrista, which he names as Tuscan and whose fat he uses to brown potatoes, and recipe 527, the garlic and rosemary roast served with potatoes. The Flavor Bible, also cited, sets it in bold capitals in the entry for potatoes.
Arrosto d'agnello all'aretina and agnello coi piselli all'uso di Romagna.
Read in Artusi, recipe 529, arrosto d'agnello all'aretina, basted with a rosemary sprig; recipe 319, agnello coi piselli all'uso di Romagna, studded with rosemary and garlic in sprigs and not leaves so they can be lifted out; and recipe 527, the garlic and rosemary roast he recommends for a leg of lamb. The Flavor Bible, also cited, sets it in bold capitals with an asterisk, a Holy Grail pairing in the entry for rosemary.
Set in bold in The Flavor Bible: recommended by a number of the chefs it surveyed.
Read from the entry for lemons in the 2008 edition.
Set in bold in The Flavor Bible: recommended by a number of the chefs it surveyed.
Read from the entry for oranges, in general in the 2008 edition.
Set in bold in The Flavor Bible: recommended by a number of the chefs it surveyed.
Read from the entry for venison in the 2008 edition.
Set in bold in The Flavor Bible: recommended by a number of the chefs it surveyed.
Read from the entry for rabbit in the 2008 edition.
The game rub.
Read from the entry for juniper berries in the 2008 edition, where rosemary is set in plain type.
Set in bold in The Flavor Bible: recommended by a number of the chefs it surveyed.
Read from the entry for beans, white in the 2008 edition.
Set in bold in The Flavor Bible: recommended by a number of the chefs it surveyed.
Read from the entry for polenta in the 2008 edition.
Set in plain type in The Flavor Bible: suggested by one or more of the chefs it surveyed.
Read from the entry for beef, in general in the 2008 edition.
Set in plain type in The Flavor Bible: suggested by one or more of the chefs it surveyed.
Read from the entry for turkey in the 2008 edition.
Set in plain type in The Flavor Bible: suggested by one or more of the chefs it surveyed.
Read from the entry for rosemary in the 2008 edition.
Set in plain type in The Flavor Bible: suggested by one or more of the chefs it surveyed.
Read from the entry for apricots, in general in the 2008 edition.
Bonds are drawn from culinary literature and origin-tradition references, tiered by source. Origin means a reference from the place. Witness means the pairing is the place's own and the reference documenting it was written from outside.
The score is cultural weight: how central a pairing is in the tradition that documents it. It is not a prediction of how two materials behave in a formulation and not a measure of chemical affinity. The scale is ordinal, because centrality is a judgement rather than a measurement: 1.0 where the pair is the dish, 0.9 a fixed named form, 0.8 a canonical dish, 0.7 recurrent across many dishes, 0.6 common, 0.5 attested, 0.4 marginal or compound-led.
Each score is set against a named dish and carries that dish in its note. Where a score has not been examined it says so, because an inherited figure and a researched one should not look alike.
The dish is named by a reader who knows the cuisine and cites a source appropriate to it. It has not yet been confirmed inside that source page by page, so a note records what supports a score rather than what has been checked in the book.
Studio Culinar-E, "rosemary", Pantry Archive, Studio Monk-E, 2026. https://studioculinar-e.com/archive/rosemary
/archive/rosemary
Bonds are tiered by source, origin-tradition references first.